WHAT IS OUR SPECIALTY/UNIQUENESS IN NATURE

WHAT IS OUR SPECIALTY/UNIQUENESS IN NATURE

Is it not true that with earth is rotating and revolving on its own due to which day and night and various seasons are happening ?

Perhaps no.

Is it not true that if the movement of earth somehow stops it will going to be a havoc so far as functioning of other natural processes (including existence of various life forms) are concerned ?

Is vice-verse true ? Perhaps no.

Is it not true that if air,water,sun and soil go out of existence the various life forms will be no more in existence ?

Is vice-verse true ? Perhaps no.

Is it not true that if plants go out of existence humans and other forms of animals will be no more in existence ?

Is vice-verse true ? Perhaps no.

Is it not true that for a small population of humans living in cool places and coastal areas (where sufficient food from plant origin is not available) will be go out of existence if the animals (which they are using as food for their survival) become extinct ?

Is vice-verse true ? Perhaps no.

From the above is it not clear that all the parts of the nature except humans are necessary for survival of the next in the chain (inanimate to animate as portrayed above) and are playing their role as assigned by the nature (their karma/ swabhava) and they have no option but to do what they are doing ?

Further is it not true that all of them have specific duty assigned and their duties can never be exchanged among them ?

Is it not true that the natural cycle will be badly disturbed if supposing any one of the parts mentioned above stops doing its assigned duty (karma/swabhava) ?

It simply means every part of the nature is special/unique so far as the duty assigned by the nature is concerned ; hence the for smooth functioning of the nature the presence of all these parts are must. In another words all of them are contributing positively in running the nature without any feeling of discrimination which is very obvious.

Now come to humans and try to find out in what way we are special.

Air,water,food and sleep are basic necessity for the survival of our body.

Is it not true that we are the only part of the nature which is engaged in polluting air (which is freely available in nature) which is the most important for not only our survival, but for other forms of life also ?

Is it not true that we are the only part of the nature which is engaged in polluting water (which is freely available in nature) which is the most important for not only our survival, but for other forms of life also ?

Is it not true that we are the only part of the nature which is engaged in manipulating/interfering (GM food - going to create havoc) the natural evolution/mutation of food products coming from the plants life ?

Is it not true that we have disturbed not only our natural sleep, but of most of the animals and the plants also which are in and around our areas of activities ?

Is it not true that we cut the tree even without having the need (compelling circumstances) to cut it ?

Can this act not be termed as violence (intention to kill just for fun/greed not for need) ?

Is it not true that we kill (destroy animal's life) even without having the need (compelling circumstances) to cut it ?

Can this act not be termed as violence (intention to kill just for fun/greed not for need) ?

Is it not true that we not only destroy trees and animal lives, but our own fellow brothers and sisters even without having the need (compelling circumstances) to kill them ?

Can this act not be termed as violence (intention to kill just out of rage or hatred or brainwashed, etc. not for any need) ?

Looking into the actions of ours as mentioned above is it not true that none of our actions is indicative of our positive contribution in smooth running of the nature ? In fact all are negatives.

Then question arises in which manner or in what way the humans are special/unique like any other part of nature ?

What is the duty(karma/swabhava) assigned to this species (being a part of nature) by the nature which cannot be done/ performed by any other part of the nature because on the basis of duty only our uniqueness/specialty can be inferred like in the case of other parts ?

Is it not factually true that the presence of humans is not needed at all for smooth functioning of the nature's activities(activities of other parts) ?

Then question arises why the nature has created the humans in the first place , if that is not the need of nature i.e. not required at all as the nature is not getting affected by its absence.

Is it not true that we enjoy maximum in the presence of minimum no. of humans like in jungles (the concept of making hill stations was based upon this only) ? Why ?

interpretation of scriptures

The message behind these gospels/scriptures is perhaps most difficult to understand/decipher, if at all they are not simply stories written for specific purpose for those times. Neither we can say they are just stories nor as having some deep meaning/message behind that. In my opinion if there is any truth in these scriptures then the best interpretation is one which is most logical (devoid of belief and faith) supported with direct or indirect contemporary evidences (including scientific results). If something is left to be interpreted logically, that should be left for the time being. Otherwise there can be numerous interpretations taking various bases/references appearing to be quite appealing too, but not capable of transforming the consciousness of a large population. The state of affairs of world today is telling loudly that we have not understood or we are not convinced with the interpretations made till date. What we are perceiving with our sense organs and mind are not in conformity with the interpretations made. Pl. don't misunderstand Kora Koosji.

STOP PLAYING MENTAL GAMES RECOGNISE THE REALITY

STOP PLAYING MENTAL GAMES RECOGNISE THE REALITY



Is it not true that we have known duality only ?


Is it not true that for us knowledge of separateness is practical truth?


Is it not true that in any search we have to start from where (the level of understanding) we are?


Is it not true that we can start searching a thing (which can be perceived by sense organs) by any positive way i.e. by recognising the thing and saying "This is, This is" ?


Is it not true that we cannot start searching a thing (which cannot be perceived by sense organs ) by any positive way i.e. by recognising the thing and saying "This is, This is"?


Is it not true that the only way left to us to start searching a thing (which cannot be perceived by sense organs) is by negative way i.e. by recognising and eliminating the known things and saying "This is not, This is not (Neti-Neti)."?


Is it not true that in all the three ways mentioned above, the reference point is the things which can be perceived by sense organs ?


From the above is it not clear that we can discuss/search in reference to only those things which can be perceived by sense organs ; hence only in duality ?


Will it not look foolish on our part to start looking directly for non-dual character/nature of the thing as it is , because we are totally unaware of it ?


Therefore why should we not go on exploring/investigating the duality itself and try to find out whether the knowledge/feeling of separateness which is the main pillar of existence of concept of duality, is true or not ?


Does the above appeal to you or appear to be logical/scientific ?




Then stop playing games with yourself

and

understand the trick of your mind

which in order to continue its existence

is be-fooling you.